Skip to main content

Climate

Energy use

Direct energy use

Fuel consumption is the most important environmental factor in the otherwise energy demanding operation of Isavia. We closely monitor fuel consumption in our operations and make efforts to try and reduce it where possible. Tests involving the addition of rapeseed oil to fuel used on equipment were initiated last year, and the hope is that we will be able to increase the proportion added in coming years. 

The greatest share of this consumption by far is accounted for by the servicing and maintenance of the runways and operating areas of airports. Although its scope in some ways relates to the number of passengers, it is for the most part dependent on the weather and, as a result, may fluctuate, particularly if winter services are required for many days of the year. During the winter of 2019–2020, winter services at Keflavík Airport were provided for 141 days. Snow clearing took 5,460 machine hours.

Isavia has operated according to an Environment and Climate Action Plan that is applicable to the end of 2021. This plan sets out various measures aimed at reducing the negative environmental impact of the company’s operations. The measures involve aspects such as the renewal of its vehicle fleet, machinery, the prudent use of resources, increased electrification and carbon off-setting. We have already begun working on the revision of this action plan and the formulation of a new sustainability policy.

There was some reduction in the fuel consumption of Isavia when account is taken of the overall fuel consumption. When, however, account is taken of the use per passenger, there was a considerable increase in fuel consumption between years. This can be traced to the considerable decrease in the number of passengers to Keflavík Airport as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, it was clearly shown that Isavia’s fuel use did not correlate to the number of passengers to any great extent, as stated above. Isavia’s target for 2020 was to reduce fuel consumption per passenger by 4%, but this was not achieved.


Energy consumption within the organiztion GRI 302-1 & Reduction of energy consumption GRI 302-4

Type20152016201720182019*20202020 kWh
Petrol45.665  l47.131 l40.769 l39.964 l37.400 l26.962 l7.777.867
Diesel751.722 l714.574 l819.696 l893.326 l853.682l759.292 l246.702
Aircraft fuelxx62.468 l77.520 l78.131 l66.676 l682.390
Per passenger0,148 l0,106 l0,096 l0,095 l0,114 l0,501 l 
* Figures for 2019 have been updated in light of new data.

ISAVIA IS CONSCIOUS OF THE RESPONSIBILITY IT BEARS REGARDING CLIMATE ISSUES AND GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS AND IS WORKING IN AN ACTIVE AND ORGANISED WAY ON MEASURES TO REDUCE ITS CARBON FOOTPRINT

Indirect energy use

 Last year, electricity consumption at Isavia was 21,887,504 kWh – a considerable decrease from the preceding two years. This can first and foremost be traced to the company’s economisations during the Covid-19 pandemic. The reduction in energy use was greatest at the Leifur Eiríksson Air Terminal at Keflavík Airport, although there were also significant reductions in other airports in Iceland. The figures for previous years have been updated in light of actual use to correct forecasts.

Energy consumption is forecasted to rise in the coming years as result of the expansion of Keflavík Airport and of further installation and greater use of energy-intensive infrastructure, e.g. grounding for aircraft and charging points for cars and other vehicles. The amount of hot water used by Isavia was 834,379 cubic metres (48,393,956 kWh). This use corresponds to the use of approximately 980 150-square metre homes.

Electricity use GRI 302-2

Year kWh
2016 22843018
2017 29421110
2018 28682370
2019 23440870
2020 21887504

Greenhouse gas emissions

Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through energy use scope 1

The direct emission of greenhouse gases by Isavia can be traced to fuel use. In 2020, the amount of direct greenhouse gas emissions caused by burning fossil fuels was 2194 t CO2e. This is considerably less than in the years before. In early (spring) 2019, Isavia reached an agreement with Kolviður and Votlendissjóður for the carbon off-setting of Isavia fuel consumptions for three years, retroactive for one year. This means that in 2018, 2019 and 2020, Isavia will have carbon off-set all direct emissions from the operation, or a total of 7198 t CO2e.

Last year, it became clear how much of Isavia’s carbon footprint is connected to the use of large machinery and services to aprons, runways and taxiways. Despite the unprecedented downturn in operations, where the number of flights and passengers decreased significantly, there was not much of a decrease in Isavia’s carbon footprint. The clearing of runways and other winter and maintenance work that Airport Operations carries out is in all respects independent of the number of flights or passengers; the scope of tasks remains the same. Isavia’s greatest challenge with regard to reducing its carbon footprint is to find solutions on how to minimise the emissions of greenhouse gases from the specialised equipment used by the airport.


Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scope 1 GRI 305-1

Emissions due to energy consumption in CO2 tonnes2016201720182019*2020
Isavia total2.1462.4582.6942.5132.194
Isavia ohf.xxxx1460
Isavia Reginal Airportsxxxx469
Isavia ANSxxxx239
Duty-Free Storexxxx26
* Figures for 2019 have been updated in light of new data.

INDIRECT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (GHG)
THROUGH ENERGY USE SCOPE 2

In 2019, Isavia reached an electricity agreement with HS Veitur. The agreement provides that all electricity purchased by Isavia will be from renewable sources and free of charges due to the sale-of-origin guarantees. The energy used by Isavia in its operation in the form of electricity or heat comes from district heating plants or hydropower plants. In both cases, the energy in question is from renewable sources which generate low emissions of greenhouse gases. Indirect emissions due to heat and electricity, therefore, are very slight if account is taken of electricity production by other means. Indirect emissions through energy consumption in 2020 totalled 215 t CO2.

OTHER INDIRECT GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS (GHG)
THROUGH ENERGY USE SCOPE 3

Emissions in scope 3, indirect emissions from the operation, include the treatment of waste and employee travel. In recent years, Isavia has used the Festa Loftlagsmælir (Festa climate gauge) to estimate carbon emissions relating to scope 3, although 2019 was the first year in which Isavia fully utilised the Klappir environment monitoring system. This has provided a better picture of carbon emissions. A part of the general waste from Keflavík Airport, however, is not sent to landfills but is instead incinerated in the Reykjanes incinerator of Kalka. The emission factor for the incineration of waste is lower than those that apply to landfill disposals. Emissions from incineration and landfill waste disposal by Isavia in 2020 were 86 tonnes of CO2e.

Direct emissions of greenhouse gases per passenger increased considerably between the years 2019 and 2020. The pandemic has been instrumental in this trend. One must realise, however, that it is clear that emissions per passenger is not a good indicator. A closer examination must be made of what indicators are more appropriate. Isavia’s goal, however, is to minimise its total emissions, irrespective of the number of passengers or number of flights. We continue to strive to reduce total emissions as well as emissions from large factors such as fuel consumption. There was a decrease of 12.7% in direct greenhouse gas emissions from fuel consumption from 2019 to 2020.

Reduction of GHG emissions 305-5



201720182019*2020
GHG emission from landfill/disposaltonnes CO259669486
GHG emission from electricitytonnes CO2206338255215
GHG emission from fueltonnes CO22.4582..69425132194
Total emissions GHGtonnes CO22.7233.09828622495
Carbon offsettonnes CO202..69423102194
Total emissions GHG with carbon offsettonnes CO22.723404552301
Emissons per passengertonnes CO20,370,290,341,47





* Figures for 2019 have been updated in light of new data.


GHG emissions intensity per passenger GRI 305-4

Year kg.
2015 0,6
2016 0,46
2017 0,37
2018 0,29
2019 0,34
2020 1,47

ISAVIA´S CARBON FOOTPRINT

Isavia has set itseld a number of objectives of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in its operations and is thereby leading by example in being environmentally and socially responsible. Keflavík Airport participates in the Airport Carbon Accreditation system with the goal of carbon neutrality. A distinction is made between three sources of emissions (scopes): Firstly, direct emissions from Isavia‘s own operations, secondly indirect emissions from purchased energy and thirdly emissions from third parties associated with Isavia‘s operations.

Choose scopes of emission:

1
Vehicles /equipment belonging to the airport
3
Firefighting exercises
2
Auxiliary power
4
Off-site electricity
5
Hot water
A
Aircraft stands
B
Charging stations
6
Aircraft taking off and landing
7
Aircraft ground movements
8
Auxiliary Power Unit of aircrafts
9
3rd party vehicles/ ground support equipment
10
Passenger travel to and from the airport
11
Staff commute
12
Off-site waste management
13
Staff business travel

Air quality

Isavia monitors nitrogen dioxide levels around Keflavík Airport by means of an air quality meter located over Eyjabyggð. Real-time measurements can be found on the loftgaedi.is website. Air quality forecasts have been prepared for 13.7m passengers and 14.5m passengers. In both cases, the concentration of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide is under reference values. Based on the passenger forecast used in the Masterplan for Keflavík Airport, just over 13 million passengers are expected in 2039.

In 2019, the CEO of Isavia signed a NetZero Commitment issued by ACI Europe to the effect that Keflavík airport, together with numerous other airports in Europe, will be carbon-free by 2050 at the very latest.

Isavia has also been a signatory to the Climate Agreement of the City of Reykjavík and Festa – the Center for Sustainability since 2015. Following the signing of this declaration, Isavia set itself the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, thus demonstrating initiative and responsibility towards the environment and society.

Isavia is conscious of the responsibility it bears regarding climate issues and greenhouse gas emissions and is working in an active and organised way on measures to reduce its carbon footprint.

Iavia’s greatest challenge with regard to reducing its carbon footprint is to find solutions on how to minimise the emissions of greenhouse gases from the specialised equipment used by the airport.

ACA CARBON ACCREDITATION

Isavia participates in the Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) system, run by Airports Council International. The ACA is a form of carbon accreditation designed by airports for airports and is therefore customised to their operations. The project, which was previously divided into four stages, has now been updated in accordance with the NetZero commitment and is now six stages. Keflavík Airport has taken part in the project for five years, and in 2019, Isavia completed the second stage in the adoption of the carbon accreditation. The objective has been set to reduce carbon emissions by 2030, and work is under way according to an action plan.

Our people

- opportunities in rapeseed oil

Ásgeir Húnbogason

Ásgeir Húnbogason

Workshop foreman of airport operation services, Keflavík Airport

How has the project of adding rapeseed oil to fuel for heavy machinery at Keflavík airport been going?
To begin we added the rapeseed oil to the fuel of one machinery. It is a payloader used for clearing snow from the area around the runways.

The project got underway in late 2020 but moved slowly due to Covid-19. The specialist from the Icelandic Transport Authority was not able to measure emissions from the machinery due to infection prevention rules. Because of this, the fuel with added rapeseed oil could not be put into use until mid-December. Only then the emissions measurements could be executed. In January 2021 emissions were measured again with varying amounts of rapeseed oil addition into the fuel, from 5%, 10% and finally 20%. The measurements showed a significant difference in emissions between 5% and 10% addition, but the difference was slight when the 20% mixture was measured compared to 10% addition. Today we use a 10% addition. The lack of snow has however resulted in little use of the machinery, or only about 70 working hours and therefore experience is lacking.

How does rapeseed oil work on the machinery?
There is no indication of a negative effect on the machinery, smoke has not increased, if anything it has decreased, and we don’t recognise any difference in engine power. However more experience is needed for us to gain a better understanding of the effects and function. Little use of the machinery causes experience to be less than predicted. However, the project will continue, and data is being collected.


Do these tests indicate further opportunities of additives of rapeseed oil to fuel?
I would say that there are other opportunities, but more time is needed for further testing of the machinery and all required licences need to be obtained for further mixing.

Borealis Alliance Free Route Airpspace

Isavia is a member of Borealis Alliance, an association of nine air navigation service providers (ANSP) in Northern Europe. Work is ongoing on the Free Route Airspace project, aimed at shorter flight times, resulting in lower fuel consumption, lower costs and less pollution. In Iceland, aircraft operators can now schedule and operate direct flights from Keflavík Airport to airports in Norway and Scotland, the nearest air traffic control areas to the south-east of Icelandic airspace.

The effects of flight altitude on the fuel consumption of aircraft are considerable. As a flight progresses, it is more economical for aircraft to fly at higher altitudes. It is estimated that a thousand-foot (1,000 feet) deviation from the optimal altitude calls for 1% extra fuel per hour.